LAD/Blog #19: The Dred Scott Decision

-
Image result for dred scott

In the landmark ruling on 1857, the Supreme Court ruled at 7-2, that Dredd Scott couldn't sue for his own freedom. The reason for this conclusion was that he wasn't an American Citizen because he was African American, and thus had no rights. Dredd Scott sued after the state in which he resided went from slave to free. It went through multiple levels of court,  until it finally reached the Supreme Court. There the Chief Justice, Robert Taney ruled that the lawsuit brought forth should never have been entertained in the first place, because Scott was not a US citizen. This has been highly criticized as a misinterpretation of the constitution because Taney had a conflict of interest due to his ownership of slaves. This was a landmark decision that was revered in the South but despised in the North. This was just before the civil war, and had a major role in the war.
Image result for marbury v madison
Marbury V Madison









 This case was very similar to Marbury Vs Madison in that both cases were very high level supreme court cases in which the rulings made a big impact on how the country was run.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #2: Peter Zenger

-
Image
                              1.)    Who was Peter Zenger? Zenger was the printer for the New York Weekly Journal, which had published accusations of tyranny and mistreatment of people's rights about New York Governor Cosby. Because of this Governor Cosby decided to go after Peter Zenger, on the assumption that without a printer, the Journal would not be able to be published. This led to Zenger's arrest. 2.)   What was the controversy over his charges? Zenger's arrest was made controversial when his lawyer, Andrew Hamilton made clear to the jury that his charge, publishing of seditious libel, required for the information published by his newspaper to be false. Since Zenger had only published true information, the Jury acquitted (good wordel) him of his charges. 3.)   What influence did his case have on American governmental traditions? Though his case did not have any immediate impacts, it was cemented in the general public's mind, and which was embodied by the B
Read more

LAD/Blog #29: Clayton Anti-Trust Act

-
Image
The Clayton Anti Trust Act was made as a replacement to the ineffective Sherman Anti Trust Act. The Sherman Anti Trust Act was vague and weak. It was abused by pro business governmental leaders, and was even used as an excuse to attack union strikers. The Clayton Anti-Trust Act on the other hand, accomplished a point for each finger. The 5 points included the restriction of price fixing, unfair tying and dealing practices, giving the power to sue corporations to individuals, allowing unions, and stopping anti competitive mergers. The Federal Trade Commission was also formed in 1914 which created a regulatory body, providing accountability to these big companies. The Anti Trust Division of the US Department of Justice also accomplished this goal. The act was passed during Wilson's Presidency
Read more

Blog #3: Declaration of Independence.

-
Image
1.  List the democratic principles discussed in the opening. Many democratic principles are discussed during the opening of the declaration of independence. One of these includes the idea that "all men are created equal", and are granted with, "unalienable rights", including rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The declaration also continues in emphasizing that the government is run by the citizens, and not by one person, like in a monarchy. It is also included that citizens have the right to overthrow the government if they feel the government is ignoring the majorities' requests. 2.  List 5 grievances the colonists were making the King aware of.  One of the actions taken by the declaration of independence was the listing of grievances of the American public. American concerns included the ignoring or salutary neglect policy that the British had to American colonies. Other grievances include how the British didn't establish a j
Read more